Pineda v. Bank of America NA (In re Pineda)
This text of 601 F. App'x 505 (Pineda v. Bank of America NA (In re Pineda)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Walter R. Pineda appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order abstaining from deciding an adversary proceeding against appellees. We dismiss.
We lack jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court’s decision to abstain pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(1). See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(d).
We reject Pineda’s contention that the BAP violated his due process rights in the handling of his appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
601 F. App'x 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pineda-v-bank-of-america-na-in-re-pineda-ca9-2015.