Pine Terrace Associates, Ltd. v. Lidster

Supreme Court of Georgia

Pine Terrace Associates, Ltd. v. Lidster

341 S.E.2d 8, 255 Ga. 405, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 546

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 12, 1986·No. 42869·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore [406] vacated.

Decided February 12, 1986. Hatcher, Stubbs, Land, Hollis & Rothschild, Robert C. Martin, Jr., for appellants. Davis, Harp & Smith, Arthur L. Smith III, for appellee. All the Justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., and Clarke, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter, it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari and the writ is therefore [406] vacated.

Decided February 12, 1986. Hatcher, Stubbs, Land, Hollis & Rothschild, Robert C. Martin, Jr., for appellants. Davis, Harp & Smith, Arthur L. Smith III, for appellee. All the Justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., and Clarke, J., who dissent.

Pine Terrace Associates, Ltd. v. Lidster, 341 S.E.2d 8, 255 Ga. 405, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 546 (Ga. 1986).

Pincite

341 S.E.2d 8 (Pine Terrace Associates, Ltd. v. Lidster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related