Pine Island Lumber, Inc. v. Festa
575 So. 2d 204, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 196, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 409, 1991 WL 25370
Opinion
In Festa v. Pine Island Lumber, Inc., 561 So.2d 345, 345-46 (Fla.2d DCA 1990), the district court certified the following question as being of great public importance:
CAN A NONPARTY RECOVER COSTS IT HAS INCURRED ON BEHALF OF A NAMED PARTY UNDER THE RULE AND STATUTES REGARDING OFFERS OF JUDGMENT, OR ARE COSTS RECOVERABLE UNDER THOSE PROVISIONS ONLY BY PARTIES WHO HAVE PAID COSTS OR INCURRED LIABILITY TO DO SO?
We recently answered this question in Aspen v. Bayless, 564 So.2d 1081, 1082 (Fla.1990), and held “that a party is not precluded from recovering costs ... when someone other than the named party pays or advances those costs.” Therefore, we quash Festa and direct the district court to affirm the award of costs to Pine Island.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pine Island Lumber, Inc. v. Festa, 575 So. 2d 204, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 196, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 409, 1991 WL 25370 (Fla. 1991).
575 So. 2d 204 (Pine Island Lumber, Inc. v. Festa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Autrey v. Memory
168 So. 3d 1260 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2015)
Hart v. City of Groveland
919 So. 2d 665 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Manor Healthcare Corp. v. Lomelo
929 F.2d 633 (Eleventh Circuit, 1991)