Pine Hills First National Bank v. Bay Development Corp.
294 So. 2d 313, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3947
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3),' Florida Constitution (1973), F.S. A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pine Hills First National Bank v. Bay Development Corp., 294 So. 2d 313, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 3947 (Fla. 1974).
294 So. 2d 313 (Pine Hills First National Bank v. Bay Development Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Chapin
179 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Wellons v. Howe ex rel. Howe
181 So. 2d 370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)