Pine Hill Crystal Spring Water Co. v. United States

58 F.2d 506, 74 Ct. Cl. 729, 11 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 247, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 451, 1932 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9250
United States Court of Claims·Decided May 2, 1932·No. No. J-613·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[737] MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

This case turns upon tbe question as to whether tbe plaintiff filed in time a proper claim for refund. Plaintiff contends that tbe letter of January 31, 1923 (Finding III), is a sufficient and legal refund claim. This issue was involved in tbe case of Philipsborn v. United States, 72 C. Cls. 545, and we think that tbe plaintiff’s case comes within that decision. See also Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States, 260 U. S. 565.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pine Hill Crystal Spring Water Co. v. United States, 58 F.2d 506, 74 Ct. Cl. 729, 11 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 247, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 451, 1932 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9250 (cc 1932).

58 F.2d 506 (Pine Hill Crystal Spring Water Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edward Chalmers Sweeney v. United States
285 F.2d 444 (Court of Claims, 1961)
Sweeney v. United States
285 F.2d 444 (Court of Claims, 1961)