Home/New York Court of Appeals/Pine Co. v. McConnell

Pine Co. v. McConnell

80 N.E.2d 137, 298 N.Y. 27
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 4, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 80 N.E.2d 137 (Pine Co. v. McConnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pine Co. v. McConnell, 80 N.E.2d 137, 298 N.Y. 27 (N.Y. 1948).

Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 29 Personal jurisdiction of defendants was properly obtained by substituted service under section 229-b of the Civil Practice Act. Defendants' local activities amply satisfied the long-recognized test of what constitutes engaging in business, as laid down in the decisions of this court. (See, e.g., Chaplin v. Selznick, 293 N.Y. 529, 534; Tauza v. Susquehanna CoalCo., 220 N.Y. 259.) It is unnecessary, at this time, to say whether and to what extent that test may be relaxed in reliance upon the constitutional principles recently announced by the Supreme Court in International Shoe Co. v. Washington (326 U.S. 310).

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Twine v. Levy
746 F. Supp. 1202 (E.D. New York, 1990)
ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. Lennon
85 Misc. 2d 465 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
Simonson v. International Bank
200 N.E.2d 427 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)
Mirabella v. Banco Industrial de la Republica Argentina
38 Misc. 2d 128 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Lawson v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
30 Misc. 2d 274 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Jaftex Corporation, Third-Party v. Randolph Mills, Inc., Third-Party Gail Shawe, an Infant, by Annette Shawe and Earle K. Shawe, and Early K. Shawe v. Wendy Wilson, Inc., a Division of Lewis Frimel Co., and Jaftex Corporation
282 F.2d 508 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Jaftex Corp. v. Randolph Mills, Inc.
282 F.2d 508 (Second Circuit, 1960)
Schwartz v. Breakers Hotel Corp.
13 Misc. 2d 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Super Products Corp. v. Parkin
20 F.R.D. 377 (S.D. New York, 1957)
Benware v. Acme Chemical Co.
284 A.D. 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Tomaselli v. Martens
283 A.D. 742 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
New York Automatic Canteen Corp. v. Keepel & Ruof, Inc.
195 Misc. 526 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1949)
Sterling Novelty Corp. v. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co.
86 N.E.2d 564 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
Hastings v. Piper Aircraft Corp.
274 A.D. 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.E.2d 137, 298 N.Y. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pine-co-v-mcconnell-ny-1948.