Pine Bush v. Planning Board
This text of 449 N.E.2d 743 (Pine Bush v. Planning Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to strike petitioners’ brief and dismiss their cross appeal dismissed, with $20 costs to petitioners. An extension of time is not a reviewable order under rule 500.7 (d) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.7 [d]). Motion for an extension of time to serve and file respondents’ reply brief granted to the extent that the reply brief may be filed on or before April 8, 1983.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
449 N.E.2d 743, 58 N.Y.2d 1110, 462 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pine-bush-v-planning-board-ny-1983.