Pindus v. Newmat Leasing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pindus v. Newmat Leasing Corp.

58 A.D.2d 577, 394 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12601

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.2d 577 (Pindus v. Newmat Leasing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pindus v. Newmat Leasing Corp., 58 A.D.2d 577, 394 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a mortgage foreclosure action, (1) the plaintiffs appeal, as [578]*578limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 16, 1976, after a hearing, as (a) directed them to repay the sum of $26,017.49, plus interest, to the Referee in foreclosure and (b) allegedly excluded them from participating in surplus money proceedings and (2) defendants Weslip Realty Corp. and Dolphin Management Corp. cross-appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of the said order as (a) failed to direct the plaintiffs to repay an amount equal to the entire proceeds of the judgment of foreclosure and sale, (b) failed to assess the plaintiffs and their attorney counsel fees and punitive or exemplary damages and (c) failed to assess treble damages against plaintiffs’ attorney pursuant to section 487 of the Judiciary Law. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Special Term’s determination is adequately supported by the record. Cohalan, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a mortgage foreclosure action, (1) the plaintiffs appeal, as [578]*578limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 16, 1976, after a hearing, as (a) directed them to repay the sum of $26,017.49, plus interest, to the Referee in foreclosure and (b) allegedly excluded them from participating in surplus money proceedings and (2) defendants Weslip Realty Corp. and Dolphin Management Corp. cross-appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of the said order as (a) failed to direct the plaintiffs to repay an amount equal to the entire proceeds of the judgment of foreclosure and sale, (b) failed to assess the plaintiffs and their attorney counsel fees and punitive or exemplary damages and (c) failed to assess treble damages against plaintiffs’ attorney pursuant to section 487 of the Judiciary Law. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Special Term’s determination is adequately supported by the record. Cohalan, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 577, 394 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pindus-v-newmat-leasing-corp-nyappdiv-1977.