Pinder v. State

663 So. 2d 14, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12497, 1995 WL 700229
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pinder v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3667
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1995·No. No. 95-1130·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole point on appeal is whether the trial court had a basis for a negotiated plea agreement based upon defendant’s claim that the only basis for the plea rested upon the defendant’s stipulation that he possessed cocaine. Koenig v. State, 597 So.2d 256 (Fla.1992). We disagree.

Here, the record clearly demonstrates that in addition to the claimed stipulation, the defendant clearly understood the nature of the charges against him and that once he had found out his mother had cancer he turned himself around as far as “not selling drugs or getting in trouble.” The defendant has altogether failed to show how the claimed deficiency resulted in manifest injustice or prejudice.

Affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pinder v. State, 663 So. 2d 14, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12497, 1995 WL 700229 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

663 So. 2d 14 (Pinder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koenig v. State
597 So. 2d 256 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)