Pinder v. Pinder, No. Fa 89 0093669 S (Jan. 20, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Pinder v. Pinder, No. Fa 89 0093669 S (Jan. 20, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 637

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJanuary 20, 1994

DocketNo. FA 89 0093669 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 637 (Pinder v. Pinder, No. Fa 89 0093669 S (Jan. 20, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pinder v. Pinder, No. Fa 89 0093669 S (Jan. 20, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 637 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This matter came before the court on defendant's motion to open and set aside a judgment of dissolution.

The defendant alleges, inter alia, that the dissolution was granted by the court on January 11, 1990 upon a finding of actual notice. Further, that the plaintiff committed a fraud upon the court by misrepresenting the facts.

In his brief, the plaintiff's attorney argues that actual notice is sufficient even if there was failure to comply with the court's order of notice.

The court, Koletsky, J. presiding, found actual notice rather than notice in accordance with order of the court. This finding cannot be upset on the basis of the evidence presented. CT Page 638

The court further rejects the claim of fraud since it was not clearly proven. See Freda v. Freda, 39 Conn. Sup. 230 (1984).

Motion is denied.

Mihalakos, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI