Pinckney v. The Hungaria

42 F. 510, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2197
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina
DecidedMay 24, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 F. 510 (Pinckney v. The Hungaria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pinckney v. The Hungaria, 42 F. 510, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2197 (circtdsc 1890).

Opinion

Bond, J.

This cause coming on to be heard on the pleadings and proofs on the plea to the jurisdiction of the court, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decree of the district court be affirmed, and the libel herein dismissed, on the ground that the district court had, and this court had, no jurisdiction of this cause, because, at the time of the service of warrant of arrest, the vessel was without the limits of the district of South Carolina, and without the territorial jurisdiction of this court. It is further ordered and decreed that respondent’s stipulation for value be canceled, and delivered up to respondent’s proctors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Inland Barge Co. v. Nasbitt
210 F. Supp. 690 (S.D. Indiana, 1962)
The Regent
67 F. Supp. 149 (E.D. New York, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 F. 510, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinckney-v-the-hungaria-circtdsc-1890.