Pinckney v. Carroll

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 11, 2021·No. 1:18-cv-12198·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT BOC dO NICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 2/11/2021 PARISGISELLE PINCKNEY, Plaintiff, -against- 1:18-cv-12198-MKV LOUISE CARROLL, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development; THE ORDER OF DISMISSAL NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT; and THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter from the parties informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 87]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if a settlement agreement has not been executed if the application to restore the action is made by March 15, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / be Date: February 11, 2021 MARY afar? New York, NY United States Disirict Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pinckney v. Carroll, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Pinckney v. Carroll (Pinckney v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muze Inc. v. Digital on Demand, Inc.
356 F.3d 492 (Second Circuit, 2004)