Pinck v. Jelleme

126 A. 926, 2 N.J. Misc. 1103, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 14
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 24, 1924
StatusPublished

This text of 126 A. 926 (Pinck v. Jelleme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pinck v. Jelleme, 126 A. 926, 2 N.J. Misc. 1103, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 14 (N.J. 1924).

Opinion

Per 0 mi am.

The relator applied to John Jelleme, building inspector of the city of Passaic, for a permit to erect a two-family two- and-one-half-storv house upon premises known and desig[1104]*1104natecl as No. 144 Paulison avenue, in the city of Passaic. Although the relator had complied with the municipal regulations governing such an application the permit was refused.

The sole reason for the refusal of the permit is that the land in question has been placed in Eesidence “A” District, under the zoning ordinance of that municipality.

We think the facts of this case fall within the doctrine laid down in Ignaciunas v. Risley, 1 N. J. Adv. R. 1023; 121 Atl. Rep. 783, which case is controlling here.

A peremptory writ is ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ignaciunas v. Risley
121 A. 783 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A. 926, 2 N.J. Misc. 1103, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinck-v-jelleme-nj-1924.