Pinchback v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Pinchback v. State

1919 OK CR 11, 177 P. 119, 15 Okla. Crim. 402, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 4

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 13, 1919·No. No. A-2607.·Published

Opinion

GALBRAITH, Special Judge.

The plaintiffs in error, John Pinchback and Albert Stephens, were jointly charged and convicted of keeping a place with the intention and for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, under section 4, c. 26, Sess. Laws 1913.

This case involves the same issues as the case of Proctor v. State, ante, p. 388, 176 Pac. 771, decided • this term, and is controlled thereby. For the reasons set out in that opinion, the judgment appealed-from is reversed.

DOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GALBRAITH, Special Judge.

The plaintiffs in error, John Pinchback and Albert Stephens, were jointly charged and convicted of keeping a place with the intention and for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, under section 4, c. 26, Sess. Laws 1913.

This case involves the same issues as the case of Proctor v. State, ante, p. 388, 176 Pac. 771, decided • this term, and is controlled thereby. For the reasons set out in that opinion, the judgment appealed-from is reversed.

DOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Pinchback v. State, 1919 OK CR 11, 177 P. 119, 15 Okla. Crim. 402, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 4 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

1919 OK CR 11 (Pinchback v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related