Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma/Pinchback v. State

Pinchback v. State

1919 OK CR 11, 177 P. 119, 15 Okla. Crim. 402, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 4
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 13, 1919
DocketNo. A-2607.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 11 (Pinchback v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pinchback v. State, 1919 OK CR 11, 177 P. 119, 15 Okla. Crim. 402, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 4 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

GALBRAITH, Special Judge.

The plaintiffs in error, John Pinchback and Albert Stephens, were jointly charged and convicted of keeping a place with the intention and for the purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, under section 4, c. 26, Sess. Laws 1913.

This case involves the same issues as the case of Proctor v. State, ante, p. 388, 176 Pac. 771, decided • this term, and is controlled thereby. For the reasons set out in that opinion, the judgment appealed-from is reversed.

DOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 11, 177 P. 119, 15 Okla. Crim. 402, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinchback-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.