Pinchback v. Killian

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Pinchback v. Killian

43 S.C.L. 413

DecidedMay 15, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 43 S.C.L. 413 (Pinchback v. Killian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pinchback v. Killian, 43 S.C.L. 413 (S.C. Ct. App. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’Neall, J.

In this case, we do not perceive from anything which is before us, that the plaintiff has any interest in favor of the defendant and against his other creditors. He seems to us to stand equally between them.

[415]*415The only question is, can he, if consenting, be sworn for the defendant ? The case of Corrie vs. Calder & Milner, 6 Rich. 198, answers that he can. I can add nothing to the reasoning of that case, and therefore I do not attempt it.

The motion is granted.

Wardlaw, Withers, Whither and Munro, JJ., concurred.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI