Pinchas Halperin, LLC v. U C Mgt., LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 5, 2026·No. 2021-05016·Published

Opinion

Pinchas Halperin, LLC v U C Mgt., LLC

2026 NY Slip Op 04860

August 5, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

In the Matter of Pinchas Halperin, LLC, petitioner,

v

U C Management, LLC, et al., respondents- respondents, et al., respondent; Douglas J. Pick, etc., proposed intervenor-appellant.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on August 5, 2026

2021-05016, (Index No. 521021/19)

Mark C. Dillon, J.P.

Cheryl E. Chambers

Lillian Wan

Laurence L. Love, JJ.

Pick & Zabicki LLP, New York, NY (Douglas J. Pick pro se of counsel), for proposed intervenor-appellant.

Pollock Cohen LLP, New York, NY (Adam L. Pollock of counsel), for respondents-respondents.

[*1]

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, inter alia, to enjoin U C Management, LLC, and Yitzchak Kaminetzky from breaching certain contractual duties and financial obligations concerning Kamin Health Williamsburg, LLC, and to compel their compliance with an interim order dated December 22, 2020, issued by a Beth Din in a pending arbitration proceeding between the parties until a final decision and award is rendered in that proceeding, the proposed intervenor, Douglas J. Pick, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of Kamin Health Williamsburg, LLC, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Wavny Toussaint, J.), dated June 22, 2021. The order, upon a stipulation of settlement dated June 2, 2021, dismissed the petition, deemed as withdrawn (1) a pending motion by the petitioner to hold U C Management, LLC, and Yitzchak Kaminetzky in civil contempt and to impose a fine upon them for failing to comply with a temporary restraining order of the same court dated September 27, 2019, and a preliminary injunction order of the same court dated December 6, 2019, (2) a pending motion by U C Management, LLC, and Yitzchak Kaminetzky, in effect, to partially vacate the December 6, 2019 preliminary injunction order, and (3) a pending motion by U C Management, LLC, and Yitzchak Kaminetzky to vacate the interim order dated December 22, 2020, issued by the Beth Din, and, in effect, denied a motion by the proposed intervenor, Douglas J. Pick, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of Kamin Health Williamsburg, LLC, to intervene in this matter.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from so much of the order as, upon a stipulation of settlement dated June 2, 2021, dismissed the petition and deemed as withdrawn (1) a pending motion by the petitioner to hold U C Management, LLC, and Yitzchak Kaminetzky in civil contempt and to impose a fine upon them for failing to comply with a temporary restraining order of the same court dated September 27, 2019, and a preliminary injunction order of the same court dated December 6, 2019, (2) a pending motion by U C Management, LLC, and Yitzchak Kaminetzky, in effect, to partially vacate the December 6, 2019 preliminary injunction order, and (3) a pending motion by U C Management, LLC, and Yitzchak Kaminetzky to vacate an interim order dated December 22, 2020, issued by a [*2]Beth Din must be dismissed because the appellant is not aggrieved by those portions of the order (see CPLR 5511; Estella v Val Auto, LLC, 221 AD3d 967, 968; Mixon v TBV, Inc., 76 AD3d 144, 156-157).

The appeal from so much of the order as, in effect, denied a motion by the proposed intervenor, Douglas J. Pick, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of Kamin Health Williamsburg, LLC, to intervene in this matter must be dismissed as academic, and no exception to the mootness doctrine applies (see Coleman v Daines, 19 NY3d 1087, 1090; Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714; Matter of Orangetown Police Dept. v Cashell, 238 AD3d 1152, 1153; Matter of Anonymous [South Beach Psychiatric Ctr.], 114 AD3d 675, 675; Matter of Field v Stamile, 85 AD3d 1164).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, WAN and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pinchas Halperin, LLC v. U C Mgt., LLC, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Pinchas Halperin, LLC v. U C Mgt., LLC (Pinchas Halperin, LLC v. U C Mgt., LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. Daines
979 N.E.2d 1158 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Field v. Stamile
85 A.D.3d 1164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Estella v. Val Auto, LLC
221 A.D.3d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)