Pinales v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pinales v. Reid

175 A.D.2d 919, 573 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11338

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 26, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D.2d 919 (Pinales v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pinales v. Reid, 175 A.D.2d 919, 573 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated December 20, 1986, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner to be in violation of Inmate Rule 113.12 and imposed a penalty, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered March 11, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Eiber, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated December 20, 1986, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner to be in violation of Inmate Rule 113.12 and imposed a penalty, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered March 11, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Eiber, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D.2d 919, 573 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinales-v-reid-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack