Pina v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This text of Pina v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Pina v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-3130
ROSS R. PINA,
Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent.
Lorenzo W. Tijerina, of San Antonio, Texas, argued for petitioner.
Joyce G. Friedman, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel and Stephanie M. Conley, Acting Assistant General Counsel.
Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-3130
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board
in CASE NO(S). DA0752070343-I-1
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED November 25, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pina v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pina-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2008.