Pina (Ricardo) v. State
This text of Pina (Ricardo) v. State (Pina (Ricardo) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984) (establishing two-part test for ineffective assistance of counsel); Kirksey v. State, 112 Nev. 980, 987, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996) (adopting the test in Strickland); see also Molina v. State, 120 Nev. 185, 192, 87 P.3d 533, 538 (2004) (a petitioner claiming that counsel did not conduct an adequate investigation must specify what a more thorough investigation would have uncovered). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
rcLA...st ‘-g---Csc- J. Parraguirre Saitta
cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Terrence M. Jackson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 19474 e
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pina (Ricardo) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pina-ricardo-v-state-nev-2014.