Pina (Ricardo) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 2014·No. 65422·Unpublished

Opinion

466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984) (establishing two-part test for ineffective assistance of counsel); Kirksey v. State, 112 Nev. 980, 987, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996) (adopting the test in Strickland); see also Molina v. State, 120 Nev. 185, 192, 87 P.3d 533, 538 (2004) (a petitioner claiming that counsel did not conduct an adequate investigation must specify what a more thorough investigation would have uncovered). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

rcLA...st ‘-g---Csc- J. Parraguirre Saitta

cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Terrence M. Jackson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 19474 e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pina (Ricardo) v. State, (Neb. 2014).

Pina (Ricardo) v. State (Pina (Ricardo) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Kirksey v. State
923 P.2d 1102 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1996)
Molina v. State
87 P.3d 533 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2004)