PIN v. Kramer
989 A.2d 1074, 295 Conn. 911, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 94
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 33 (AC 29314), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court incorrectly failed to give a curative instruction and, if so, was such failure harmful?”
ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
PIN v. Kramer, 989 A.2d 1074, 295 Conn. 911, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 94 (Colo. 2010).
989 A.2d 1074 (PIN v. Kramer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PIN v. Kramer
41 A.3d 657 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)