Pimsler v. Angert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pimsler v. Angert

1 A.D.2d 783, 147 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6630

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 1956·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action to restrain appellant from selling commodities of specified manufacturers below prices stipulated in contracts alleged to have been entered into pursuant to section 369-a of the General Business Law, and for damages, order granting respondents’ motion for leave to serve a supplemental complaint, affirmed, without costs. In the absence of a direction to the contrary in the order appealed from, the supplemental complaint may he considered as in addition to the original complaint. (Casassa v. Savarese, 149 App. Div. 243.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to restrain appellant from selling commodities of specified manufacturers below prices stipulated in contracts alleged to have been entered into pursuant to section 369-a of the General Business Law, and for damages, order granting respondents’ motion for leave to serve a supplemental complaint, affirmed, without costs. In the absence of a direction to the contrary in the order appealed from, the supplemental complaint may he considered as in addition to the original complaint. (Casassa v. Savarese, 149 App. Div. 243.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Pimsler v. Angert, 1 A.D.2d 783, 147 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

1 A.D.2d 783 (Pimsler v. Angert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related