Pimsler v. Angert
This text of 1 A.D.2d 783 (Pimsler v. Angert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to restrain appellant from selling commodities of specified manufacturers below prices stipulated in contracts alleged to have been entered into pursuant to section 369-a of the General Business Law, and for damages, order granting respondents’ motion for leave to serve a supplemental complaint, affirmed, without costs. In the absence of a direction to the contrary in the order appealed from, the supplemental complaint may he considered as in addition to the original complaint. (Casassa v. Savarese, 149 App. Div. 243.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 783, 147 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pimsler-v-angert-nyappdiv-1956.