Pimentel y Cao v. Brownell
208 F.2d 47
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 27, 1953
DocketNo. 11623
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 208 F.2d 47 (Pimentel y Cao v. Brownell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pimentel y Cao v. Brownell, 208 F.2d 47 (D.C. Cir. 1953).
Opinion
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S 229, 73 S.Ct. 603.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Armando Pimentel Y Cao v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
208 F.2d 47 (D.C. Circuit, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
208 F.2d 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pimentel-y-cao-v-brownell-cadc-1953.