Pimental v. Rivera

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CESAR PIMENTEL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01088-AWI-SKO

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 13 v. (Doc. 46) 14 ALFRED RIVERA and MARK CARRILLO, 15 16 Defendants. 17

18 19 On August 20, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the entire action with 20 prejudice. (Doc. 46.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 21 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 22 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24

25 Dated: August 23, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26

28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28