Pimental v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 827, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2197
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedSeptember 15, 1926
DocketDocket No. 3402.
StatusPublished

This text of 4 B.T.A. 827 (Pimental v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pimental v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 827, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2197 (bta 1926).

Opinion

OPINION.

Littleton

: The decision of the first question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315, and the decision of the Board in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B. T. A. 682.

[828]*828It is alleged that the Commissioner erred in adding to the deficiency the amount of $270.73 as a delinquency penalty. No evidence has been submitted showing that this penalty was improperly asserted by the Commissioner.

Judgment for the Commissioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robbins
269 U.S. 315 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Appeal of Pimental
4 B.T.A. 827 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 827, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pimental-v-commissioner-bta-1926.