Pilot B. L. Assoc. of Newark v. Chieff

127 A. 526, 101 N.J.L. 226, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 216
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 19, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trencitard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Yan Busicirk, Clark, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pilot B. L. Assoc. of Newark v. Chieff, 127 A. 526, 101 N.J.L. 226, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 216 (N.J. 1925).

127 A. 526 (Pilot B. L. Assoc. of Newark v. Chieff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paley v. Barton Savings and Loan Assn.
196 A.2d 682 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)