Pillsbury v. Cammett

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Pillsbury v. Cammett

2 N.H. 283

CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire

DecidedSeptember 15, 1820

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 2 N.H. 283 (Pillsbury v. Cammett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pillsbury v. Cammett, 2 N.H. 283 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

By the court.

This is an action of assumpsit against two defendants, upon a joint contract, and it is a general rule, to which this case seems to form no exception, that in such a case, judgment cannot be given against one defendant with[284]*284out the other, 1 Chitt. Pl. 31.—1 East 48, Sheriff et al. vs. Wilks.

The verdict in favor of Cammett has placed the plaintiff in ⅛ srnaiion, in which lie cannot avail himself of Jidsmb default. Js'chon, was, therefore, clearly an incompetent witness for CammeU.(l)

The verdict must be set aside, and a mw trial be granted,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court.

This is an action of assumpsit against two defendants, upon a joint contract, and it is a general rule, to which this case seems to form no exception, that in such a case, judgment cannot be given against one defendant with[284]*284out the other, 1 Chitt. Pl. 31.—1 East 48, Sheriff et al. vs. Wilks.

The verdict in favor of Cammett has placed the plaintiff in ⅛ srnaiion, in which lie cannot avail himself of Jidsmb default. Js'chon, was, therefore, clearly an incompetent witness for CammeU.(l)

The verdict must be set aside, and a mw trial be granted,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.H. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pillsbury-v-cammett-nhsuperct-1820.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack