Pillsbury v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Pillsbury v. Brown

45 Cal. 46

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1872

DocketNos. 3,423, 3,591

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Cal. 46 (Pillsbury v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pillsbury v. Brown, 45 Cal. 46 (Cal. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

We are of the opinion that section four thousand three hundred and thirty of the Political Code as amended by the Act of March 28th, 1872 (Stats. 1871-2, p. 653), was intended to regulate the salaries of District Attorneys as contradistinguished from fees, to which they were entitled under existing laws, and was not intended and did not have the effect to repeal prior statutes, allowing fees in addition to salaries.

Peremptory mandate as prayed for ordered in each case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

We are of the opinion that section four thousand three hundred and thirty of the Political Code as amended by the Act of March 28th, 1872 (Stats. 1871-2, p. 653), was intended to regulate the salaries of District Attorneys as contradistinguished from fees, to which they were entitled under existing laws, and was not intended and did not have the effect to repeal prior statutes, allowing fees in addition to salaries.

Peremptory mandate as prayed for ordered in each case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Cal. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pillsbury-v-brown-cal-1872.