Pillsbury Co. v. United States

45 F. Supp. 2d 980
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pillsbury Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 F. Supp. 2d 1034
United States Court of International Trade·Decided May 3, 1999·No. Slip Op. 99-41; Court Nos. 93-03-00161, 98-12-03190·Published

Opinion

ORDER

MUSGRAVE, Judge.

Upon careful consideration of plaintiffs Motion to Consolidate Actions and to Establish a Trial Schedule, defendant’s memorandum in opposition thereto, oral argument, and all other papers and proceedings, it is hereby:

ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Consolidate Actions and to Establish a Trial Schedule be, and hereby is, denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the parties shall confer and file, by June 2, 1999, a joint proposed Judgment Order in Court No. 93-03-00161 in accordance with the Slip-Op. 98-109, 18 F.Supp.2d 1034 granting summary judgment to the plaintiff; and it is further

ORDERED that if the parties are unable to file a joint proposed Judgment Order, then each party shall file a proposed Judgment Order by June 2, 1999.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pillsbury Co. v. United States, 45 F. Supp. 2d 980 (cit 1999).

45 F. Supp. 2d 980 (Pillsbury Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pillsbury Co. v. United States
18 F. Supp. 2d 1034 (Court of International Trade, 1998)