Pillow v. State

48 Fla. Supp. 2d 52
Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida·Decided April 1, 1991·No. Case No. 90-7-AM (Lower Court Case Nos. 90-10644TT-42-L and 90-1161-MM-42-L)·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The officer stopped Teresa L. Pillow for having a cracked tail light lens, discovered her driver’s license was suspended, and searched her vehicle, finding drug paraphernalia. This situation presents a Kehoe question. Was the warrantless stop of the vehicle one which a reason[53] able officer would have made absent the additional invalid purpose? See Kehoe v State, 521 So.2d 1094, 1097 (Fla. 1988). The officer testified that he “typically responded in the same manner” to defective equipment similar to a tail light. There is nothing in the record that refutes the officer’s statement. See State v Gibson, 560 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (“normal practice” to stop cars with loud mufflers).

AFFIRMED. McNEAL, R., BOOTH, J., SINGELTARY, G., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pillow v. State, 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 52 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1991).

48 Fla. Supp. 2d 52 (Pillow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kehoe v. State
521 So. 2d 1094 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Gibson
560 So. 2d 1370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)