Pilkington v. Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Pilkington v. Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc.

182 N.E. 164, 259 N.Y. 523, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 995

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 1932·Published

Opinion

Judgment as to defendant Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., affirmed, with costs. Judgment as to Terry & Tench *524 Company, Inc., reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that it does not appear from the evidence that the act of the superintendent was within the scope of his employment; no opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment as to defendant Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., affirmed, with costs. Judgment as to Terry & Tench *524 Company, Inc., reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that it does not appear from the evidence that the act of the superintendent was within the scope of his employment; no opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Pilkington v. Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., 182 N.E. 164, 259 N.Y. 523, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 995 (N.Y. 1932).

Pincite

182 N.E. 164 (Pilkington v. Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.