Pilkington v. Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc.

182 N.E. 164, 259 N.Y. 523, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 995
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 31, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 182 N.E. 164 (Pilkington v. Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pilkington v. Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., 182 N.E. 164, 259 N.Y. 523, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 995 (N.Y. 1932).

Opinion

Judgment as to defendant Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., affirmed, with costs. Judgment as to Terry & Tench *524 Company, Inc., reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that it does not appear from the evidence that the act of the superintendent was within the scope of his employment; no opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 N.E. 164, 259 N.Y. 523, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilkington-v-atwell-gustin-morris-inc-ny-1932.