Piljevic v. Jankovic

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 2026·No. 2D2025-1112·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

LIDIJA PILJEVIC,

Appellant,

v.

GORAN JANKOVIC,

Appellee.

No. 2D2025-1112

May 22, 2026

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert A. Bauman, Judge.

Roland A. Hermida, Tampa, for Appellant.

Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa; and Nicholas P. McNamara of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville (appeared after briefing), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a); see also Cone v. Cone, 62 So. 2d 907, 908 (Fla. 1953) (holding that court's jurisdiction to modify a dissolution decree as to custody and visitation of minor children does not depend on an express reservation of jurisdiction in the decree); Bilbo v. Bilbo, 688 So. 2d 1031, 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (same); § 61.13(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2024) ("The circuit court in the county in which either parent

and the child reside or the circuit court in which the original order approving or creating the parenting plan was entered may modify the parenting plan.").

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piljevic v. Jankovic, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Piljevic v. Jankovic (Piljevic v. Jankovic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bilbo v. Bilbo
688 So. 2d 1031 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Cone v. Cone
62 So. 2d 907 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)