Piljevic v. Jankovic
This text of Piljevic v. Jankovic (Piljevic v. Jankovic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
LIDIJA PILJEVIC,
Appellant,
v.
GORAN JANKOVIC,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-1112
May 22, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert A. Bauman, Judge.
Roland A. Hermida, Tampa, for Appellant.
Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa; and Nicholas P. McNamara of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville (appeared after briefing), for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a); see also Cone v. Cone, 62 So. 2d 907, 908 (Fla. 1953) (holding that court's jurisdiction to modify a dissolution decree as to custody and visitation of minor children does not depend on an express reservation of jurisdiction in the decree); Bilbo v. Bilbo, 688 So. 2d 1031, 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (same); § 61.13(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2024) ("The circuit court in the county in which either parent and the child reside or the circuit court in which the original order approving or creating the parenting plan was entered may modify the parenting plan.").
NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Piljevic v. Jankovic, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piljevic-v-jankovic-fladistctapp-2026.