Pilieri v. Appeal From Probate, No. Cv90 27 27 70 (Apr. 3, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Pilieri v. Appeal From Probate, No. Cv90 27 27 70 (Apr. 3, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 3705

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided April 3, 1991·No. No. CV90 27 27 70·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR HEARING By motion dated December 5, 1990, the plaintiff seeks to preserve a notice of lis pendens filed at the commencement of his appeal from probate. The appeal was dismissed because the appeal was not timely filed. The plaintiff requests the court to continue the effectiveness of his notice of lis pendens under CT Page 3706 General Statutes 52-72 (c) while he attempts to cure the defect which lead to the dismissal. He claims the defect can be remedied under General Statutes 52-72 (a). See Weidlich v. Comley, 18 Conn. Sup. 479 (1953)

The motion for a hearing is denied as is the request to continue and preserve the notice of lis pendens. This ruling should not be construed as an opinion on plaintiff's ability to cure the appeal under the provisions of General Statutes52-72(a).

THIM, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR HEARING By motion dated December 5, 1990, the plaintiff seeks to preserve a notice of lis pendens filed at the commencement of his appeal from probate. The appeal was dismissed because the appeal was not timely filed. The plaintiff requests the court to continue the effectiveness of his notice of lis pendens under CT Page 3706 General Statutes 52-72 (c) while he attempts to cure the defect which lead to the dismissal. He claims the defect can be remedied under General Statutes 52-72 (a). See Weidlich v. Comley, 18 Conn. Sup. 479 (1953)

The motion for a hearing is denied as is the request to continue and preserve the notice of lis pendens. This ruling should not be construed as an opinion on plaintiff's ability to cure the appeal under the provisions of General Statutes52-72(a).

THIM, JUDGE

Pilieri v. Appeal From Probate, No. Cv90 27 27 70 (Apr. 3, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 3705 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 3705 (Pilieri v. Appeal From Probate, No. Cv90 27 27 70 (Apr. 3, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related