Pilgrim's Rest Baptist Church v. Arthur Pearson Sr
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 26, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman
Brian K. Zahra
151680 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein
Joan L. Larsen,
PILGRIM’S REST BAPTIST CHURCH, Justices a/k/a PILGRIM’S REST MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH, NATHAN MAYFIELD, and STEPHON BLACKWELL, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants- Appellees,
v SC: 151680 COA: 318797 Kent CC: 11-012242-CZ
ARTHUR PEARSON, SR., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff- Appellant.
______________________________________/
On April 7, 2016, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
July 26, 2016
a0407
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pilgrim's Rest Baptist Church v. Arthur Pearson Sr (Pilgrim's Rest Baptist Church v. Arthur Pearson Sr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.