Pilgrim v. State
13 S.E.2d 867, 64 Ga. App. 679, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 495
Opinion
The verdict was authorized by the evidence. The single special ground of the motion for new trial is not argued or insisted on in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore it is treated as abandoned. The denial of a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pilgrim v. State, 13 S.E.2d 867, 64 Ga. App. 679, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941).
13 S.E.2d 867 (Pilgrim v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.