Pilgrim v. State
13 S.E.2d 867, 64 Ga. App. 679, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 495
This text of 13 S.E.2d 867 (Pilgrim v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pilgrim v. State, 13 S.E.2d 867, 64 Ga. App. 679, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941).
Opinion
The verdict was authorized by the evidence. The single special ground of the motion for new trial is not argued or insisted on in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore it is treated as abandoned. The denial of a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 S.E.2d 867, 64 Ga. App. 679, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilgrim-v-state-gactapp-1941.