Pilgrim v. State

499 So. 2d 850, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2428, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10679
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1986·No. No. 86-320·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. It is the second appeal because we earlier quashed an improper sentence and remanded for resentencing. Pilgrim v. State, 480 So.2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Because the trial court has once again failed to follow the dictates of the sentencing guidelines rules and statutes we must quash the sentence. Upon remand the trial judge is directed to impose a sentence of no less than five and one-half years and no greater than seven years imprisonment, probation or community control.

SENTENCE QUASHED; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pilgrim v. State, 499 So. 2d 850, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2428, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

499 So. 2d 850 (Pilgrim v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pilgrim v. State
516 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)