Pilgrim v. State

499 So. 2d 850, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2428, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10679
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 20, 1986
DocketNo. 86-320
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 499 So. 2d 850 (Pilgrim v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pilgrim v. State, 499 So. 2d 850, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2428, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. It is the second appeal because we earlier quashed an improper sentence and remanded for resentencing. Pilgrim v. State, 480 So.2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Because the trial court has once again failed to follow the dictates of the sentencing guidelines rules and statutes we must quash the sentence. Upon remand the trial judge is directed to impose a sentence of no less than five and one-half years and no greater than seven years imprisonment, probation or community control.

SENTENCE QUASHED; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pilgrim v. State
516 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
499 So. 2d 850, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2428, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilgrim-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.