Pilgrim Health & Life Insurance v. Curry

160 S.E. 121, 43 Ga. App. 699, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 522
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 27, 1931
Docket21160
StatusPublished

This text of 160 S.E. 121 (Pilgrim Health & Life Insurance v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pilgrim Health & Life Insurance v. Curry, 160 S.E. 121, 43 Ga. App. 699, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 522 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

In the instant suit on a policy of life insurance, it can not be said, in view of all the facts and circumstances disclosed by the evidence, that the finding in favor of the plaintiff was unauthorized. The charge of the court stated the contentions’’of the defendant substantially as made by the pleadings and the evidence; and if a more detailed instruction was desired, it should have been requested. The record discloses no error that requires a reversal.

Judgment affirmed.'

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur. G. N. Bynum, for plaintiff in error. Homer G. Denlon, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 S.E. 121, 43 Ga. App. 699, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilgrim-health-life-insurance-v-curry-gactapp-1931.