Piles v. Plum

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Piles v. Plum

19 F. Cas. 690, 2 Cranch 32

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 19 F. Cas. 690 (Piles v. Plum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piles v. Plum, 19 F. Cas. 690, 2 Cranch 32 (circtddc 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT,

with some hesitation (FITZ-HUGH, Circuit Judge, absent,) permitted the defendant Swann to be examined. See U. S. v. Pawling, in the supreme court of the United States, 4 Cranch [8 U. S.] 221; Harper v. Smith [Case No. 6,002], in this court at July term. 1808; U. S. v. Hunter [Id. 15,425]. at [691]*691November term. 1807; and U. S. v. Abbot [Id. 14,415], in the district court But see below, Johnson v. Chapman [Id. 7,378].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT,

with some hesitation (FITZ-HUGH, Circuit Judge, absent,) permitted the defendant Swann to be examined. See U. S. v. Pawling, in the supreme court of the United States, 4 Cranch [8 U. S.] 221; Harper v. Smith [Case No. 6,002], in this court at July term. 1808; U. S. v. Hunter [Id. 15,425]. at [691]*691November term. 1807; and U. S. v. Abbot [Id. 14,415], in the district court But see below, Johnson v. Chapman [Id. 7,378].

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 F. Cas. 690, 2 Cranch 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piles-v-plum-circtddc-1811.