Pilcher v. Stribling

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pilcher v. Stribling

659 S.E.2d 902, 290 Ga. App. 541, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1227, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 367

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 26, 2008

DocketA05A2064

StatusPublished

This text of 659 S.E.2d 902 (Pilcher v. Stribling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pilcher v. Stribling, 659 S.E.2d 902, 290 Ga. App. 541, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1227, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Adams, Judge.

In Pilcher v. Stribling, 278 Ga. App. 889 (630 SE2d94) (2006), we affirmed the trial court’s grant of a permanent restraining order against Pilcher in favor of all but one of the named protected parties under Georgia’s anti-stalking statute, OCGA § 16-5-90 (a) (1). In Pilcher v. Stribling, 282 Ga. 166 (647 SE2d 8) (2007), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our decision and held that Pilcher’s conduct does not fall within the statutory definition of stalking under that statute. Accordingly, our opinion is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, and the judgment of the trial court is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Smith, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams, Judge.

In Pilcher v. Stribling, 278 Ga. App. 889 (630 SE2d94) (2006), we affirmed the trial court’s grant of a permanent restraining order against Pilcher in favor of all but one of the named protected parties under Georgia’s anti-stalking statute, OCGA § 16-5-90 (a) (1). In Pilcher v. Stribling, 282 Ga. 166 (647 SE2d 8) (2007), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our decision and held that Pilcher’s conduct does not fall within the statutory definition of stalking under that statute. Accordingly, our opinion is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, and the judgment of the trial court is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Smith, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 S.E.2d 902, 290 Ga. App. 541, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1227, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilcher-v-stribling-gactapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack