Pilcher v. Stribling

659 S.E.2d 902, 290 Ga. App. 541, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1227, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 367
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pilcher v. Stribling. Read the opinion of the Court — 278 Ga. App. 889
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 26, 2008·No. A05A2064·Published

Opinion

Adams, Judge.

In Pilcher v. Stribling, 278 Ga. App. 889 (630 SE2d94) (2006), we affirmed the trial court’s grant of a permanent restraining order against Pilcher in favor of all but one of the named protected parties under Georgia’s anti-stalking statute, OCGA § 16-5-90 (a) (1). In Pilcher v. Stribling, 282 Ga. 166 (647 SE2d 8) (2007), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our decision and held that Pilcher’s conduct does not fall within the statutory definition of stalking under that statute. Accordingly, our opinion is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, and the judgment of the trial court is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Smith, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pilcher v. Stribling, 659 S.E.2d 902, 290 Ga. App. 541, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1227, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008).

659 S.E.2d 902 (Pilcher v. Stribling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pilcher v. Stribling
630 S.E.2d 94 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Pilcher v. Stribling
647 S.E.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)