Pilcher v. McGraw

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2007·No. 07-6945·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6945

DONALD ROBERT PILCHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEVEN A. MCGRAW, Clerk of Court; NAUDIA FENTY, Deputy Clerk,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00279-jct)

Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 25, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Robert Pilcher, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald Robert Pilcher appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Pilcher v. McGraw, No. 7:07-cv-00279-jct

(W.D. Va. June 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pilcher v. McGraw, (4th Cir. 2007).

Pilcher v. McGraw (Pilcher v. McGraw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)