Pilawski v. Habel

718 So. 2d 398, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12906, 1998 WL 712926
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 14, 1998·No. No. 98-1813·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

POLEN, J.

Renee Pilawski appeals from a nonfinal order denying her motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j), and finding that her filing of the motion resulted in her acceptance of service of process. Although we affirm the [399] court’s denying the motion to dismiss, we reverse that part of the order finding Pilaw-ski submitted to the court’s jurisdiction by filing the motion to dismiss. The law is clear that a party does not subject himself to the court’s jurisdiction by merely filing a Rule 1.070(j) motion to dismiss. Honorat v. Genova, 579 So.2d 286, 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).1

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

STEVENSON, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pilawski v. Habel, 718 So. 2d 398, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12906, 1998 WL 712926 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

718 So. 2d 398 (Pilawski v. Habel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

APAC, Inc. v. Muller
889 So. 2d 894 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)