Pilato v. Kapur
580 A.2d 59, 216 Conn. 813, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 344
This text of 580 A.2d 59 (Pilato v. Kapur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pilato v. Kapur, 580 A.2d 59, 216 Conn. 813, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 344 (Colo. 1990).
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 282, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. In a case referred to an attorney trial referee, is the decision whether to award interest as an element of damages within the province of the attorney trial referee or the trial court?
“2. Should the Appellate Court have remanded the case with direction that the determination of whether interest should be allowed be made by the attorney trial referee who had heard the case and had refused to award interest upon a ground later determined to be erroneous?
“3. Should the Appellate Court have complied with General Statutes § 51-183c in remanding the case?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pilato v. Kapur
576 A.2d 1315 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
580 A.2d 59, 216 Conn. 813, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilato-v-kapur-conn-1990.