Pilato v. Diamond

209 A.D.2d 393, 618 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11039
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 7, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 393 (Pilato v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pilato v. Diamond, 209 A.D.2d 393, 618 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), entered July 6, 1993, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendants Julius Diamond and Elsie J. Diamond after the plaintiff Giuseppe Pilato fell and was injured while working on the defendants’ property. Mr. Pilato, a landscaper, was pulling a cut vine loose from a tree when it apparently broke, causing him to fall backward and hit his heel on an oil fill pipe protruding 5 to 6 inches above the ground. The plaintiffs contended that the defendants were negligent, in that the oil fill pipe located in their backyard constituted a defective and dangerous condition. The defendants, maintaining that as a matter of law the pipe did not constitute a defective condition, moved for summary judgment. The motion was granted by the Supreme Court. We affirm.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs failed to establish the existence of a dangerous or defective condition. The pipe on the lawn was clearly visible and created no unreasonable risk of harm. Therefore, as a matter of law, the defendants were not negligent and summary judgment was properly granted (see, Gross v Lewis, 5 NY2d 884; Pesce v [394]*394Town of Huntington, 152 AD2d 555). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comack v. VBK Realty Associates, Ltd.
48 A.D.3d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Sorce v. Great Oak Marina
282 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Plessias v. John Vincent Scalia Home for Funerals, Inc.
271 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Maravalli v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
266 A.D.2d 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Perlicz v. Taratuta
260 A.D.2d 359 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Russo v. Eveco Development Corp.
256 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Cortese v. Paris Maintenance
255 A.D.2d 354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Aievoli v. Matteini
254 A.D.2d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Conroy v. Marmon Enterprises, Inc.
253 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Paulo v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
233 A.D.2d 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Kinfe v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
232 A.D.2d 373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Naim v. Schwartz Bros. Memorial Chapels, Inc.
232 A.D.2d 383 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Binensztok v. Stores
228 A.D.2d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 393, 618 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilato-v-diamond-nyappdiv-1994.