Home/New York Court of Appeals/Pilat v. Sachs

Pilat v. Sachs

368 N.E.2d 31, 42 N.Y.2d 984, 398 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2308
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 31, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 368 N.E.2d 31 (Pilat v. Sachs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pilat v. Sachs, 368 N.E.2d 31, 42 N.Y.2d 984, 398 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2308 (N.Y. 1977).

Opinion

Memorandum. The courts below considered the question of permeation of fraud and irregularities, usually a question of fact, and resolved in each instance this question in respondents’ favor. (Matter of Ruiz v McKenna, 40 NY2d 815.) Consequently, the designating petition must be sustained and the order of the Appellate Division affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Molloy v. Scaringe
153 A.D.2d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Lundine v. Hirschfeld
122 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
D'Andre v. Canary
114 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Beltz v. Board of Elections
83 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 N.E.2d 31, 42 N.Y.2d 984, 398 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilat-v-sachs-ny-1977.