Pilarsky v. Sonny Del Blvd. Meats, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pilarsky v. Sonny Del Blvd. Meats, Inc.

112 A.D.2d 206, 491 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55954

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 206 (Pilarsky v. Sonny Del Blvd. Meats, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pilarsky v. Sonny Del Blvd. Meats, Inc., 112 A.D.2d 206, 491 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.), dated May 7, 1984, which denied her motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement waiving her right to appeal from a "jury verdict” in favor of the defendants.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Justice Kunzeman at Trial Term.

We would simply add that even if we were to consider the jury verdict, we would not find it against the weight of the credible evidence (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499; Gelhaus v Pearl Riv. School Dist., 111 AD2d 149). Brown, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.), dated May 7, 1984, which denied her motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement waiving her right to appeal from a "jury verdict” in favor of the defendants.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Justice Kunzeman at Trial Term.

We would simply add that even if we were to consider the jury verdict, we would not find it against the weight of the credible evidence (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499; Gelhaus v Pearl Riv. School Dist., 111 AD2d 149). Brown, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 206, 491 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilarsky-v-sonny-del-blvd-meats-inc-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack