Pilant v. S. Grabfelder & Co.
14 N.M. 30
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT.
It was agreed that this case and No. 1149, W. B. Pilant, appellant, v. S. Ilirsch & Co., appellees, involved the same facts and legal questions and should be consolidated and decided on one brief from each side for both causes, and that the opinion rendered b3r the court should be decisive of each case'. The briefs and opinion are on file in No. 1149.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pilant v. S. Grabfelder & Co., 14 N.M. 30 (N.M. 1907).
14 N.M. 30 (Pilant v. S. Grabfelder & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ross A. McCallister v. M-A-C Finance Co. Of Tulsa, Inc. And Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
332 F.2d 633 (Tenth Circuit, 1964)