Piland v. O. K. Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Piland v. O. K. Inc.

212 So. 2d 816, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5364

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 6, 1968

DocketNo. J-477

StatusPublished

This text of 212 So. 2d 816 (Piland v. O. K. Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piland v. O. K. Inc., 212 So. 2d 816, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5364 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been orally argued before the court, and the briefs and record on appeal have been read and given full consideration. It is our view that this case, involving the interpretation of an option to purchase agreement contained in a lease, was correctly decided by the trial judge, [817]*817and the judgment appealed should therefore be affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Albee, 93 Fla. 941, 113 So. 415 (1927).

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been orally argued before the court, and the briefs and record on appeal have been read and given full consideration. It is our view that this case, involving the interpretation of an option to purchase agreement contained in a lease, was correctly decided by the trial judge, [817]*817and the judgment appealed should therefore be affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Albee, 93 Fla. 941, 113 So. 415 (1927).

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 So. 2d 816, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piland-v-o-k-inc-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack