Piland v. O. K. Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Piland v. O. K. Inc.

212 So. 2d 816, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5364

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 1968·No. No. J-477·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been orally argued before the court, and the briefs and record on appeal have been read and given full consideration. It is our view that this case, involving the interpretation of an option to purchase agreement contained in a lease, was correctly decided by the trial judge, [817] and the judgment appealed should therefore be affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Albee, 93 Fla. 941, 113 So. 415 (1927).

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been orally argued before the court, and the briefs and record on appeal have been read and given full consideration. It is our view that this case, involving the interpretation of an option to purchase agreement contained in a lease, was correctly decided by the trial judge, [817] and the judgment appealed should therefore be affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Albee, 93 Fla. 941, 113 So. 415 (1927).

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Piland v. O. K. Inc., 212 So. 2d 816, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5364 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

212 So. 2d 816 (Piland v. O. K. Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related