Piland, James Earl v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 22, 2015·No. PD-0076-15·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0076-15

JAMES EARL PILAND, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS RUSK COUNTY

P ER CURIAM. K EASLER and H ERVEY, JJ., dissent.

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(j),

and 9.4(i)(2)(D), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals,

and the petition exceeds the proper length.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be

filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.

Filed: April 22, 2015 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Piland, James Earl v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Piland, James Earl v. State (Piland, James Earl v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.