Pilafian v. Lobeck
96 So. 2d 780, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3584
Opinion
The decree is affirmed. Under the rule followed in Thomas v. Thompson, 114 Fla. 833, 155 So. 321, the proof sufficiently meets the requirements of our decision in J. C. Vereen & Sons v. Houser, 123 Fla. 641, 167 So. 45.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pilafian v. Lobeck, 96 So. 2d 780, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3584 (Fla. 1957).
96 So. 2d 780 (Pilafian v. Lobeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nearhood v. Anytime Fitness-Kingsville
178 So. 3d 623 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)