Pilafian v. Lobeck

96 So. 2d 780, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3584
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 So. 2d 780 (Pilafian v. Lobeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pilafian v. Lobeck, 96 So. 2d 780, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3584 (Fla. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree is affirmed. Under the rule followed in Thomas v. Thompson, 114 Fla. 833, 155 So. 321, the proof sufficiently meets the requirements of our decision in J. C. Vereen & Sons v. Houser, 123 Fla. 641, 167 So. 45.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., HOBSON ' and THORNAL, JJ., and KNOTT, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nearhood v. Anytime Fitness-Kingsville
178 So. 3d 623 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 2d 780, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pilafian-v-lobeck-fla-1957.