Pike v. Wasserman

New York Supreme Court

Pike v. Wasserman

30 N.Y.S. 952, 81 Hun 78, 88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 78, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 117

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 12, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 N.Y.S. 952 (Pike v. Wasserman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pike v. Wasserman, 30 N.Y.S. 952, 81 Hun 78, 88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 78, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 117 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Both being actions in the supreme court, there seems to be no doubt but that this court has the power to restrain the trial of one until the final disposition of the other, if justice demands it. We think, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed, and order granted restraining the trial of the action [954]*954subsequently brought until the final determination of the action first instituted; $10 costs and disbursements of the appeal to the appellant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Both being actions in the supreme court, there seems to be no doubt but that this court has the power to restrain the trial of one until the final disposition of the other, if justice demands it. We think, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed, and order granted restraining the trial of the action [954]*954subsequently brought until the final determination of the action first instituted; $10 costs and disbursements of the appeal to the appellant

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 N.Y.S. 952, 81 Hun 78, 88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 78, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pike-v-wasserman-nysupct-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack