Pike v. Wasserman
30 N.Y.S. 952, 81 Hun 78, 88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 78, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 117
Opinion
Both being actions in the supreme court, there seems to be no doubt but that this court has the power to restrain the trial of one until the final disposition of the other, if justice demands it. We think, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed, and order granted restraining the trial of the action [954] subsequently brought until the final determination of the action first instituted; $10 costs and disbursements of the appeal to the appellant
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pike v. Wasserman, 30 N.Y.S. 952, 81 Hun 78, 88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 78, 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 117 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
30 N.Y.S. 952 (Pike v. Wasserman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wile v. Burns Bros.
239 A.D. 59 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Pitman v. Smith
135 A.D. 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)