Pike v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Pike v. State

1930 OK CR 268, 288 P. 1117, 48 Okla. Crim. 23, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 5, 1930

DocketNo. A-7383.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 268 (Pike v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pike v. State, 1930 OK CR 268, 288 P. 1117, 48 Okla. Crim. 23, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Custer county on a charge of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a. fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 20th day of May, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, nor was there any appearance made for oral argument.

A careful examination of the record discloses that the information charges an offense and that there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict.

There being no errors depriving appellant of any substantial rights, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Custer county on a charge of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a. fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 20th day of May, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, nor was there any appearance made for oral argument.

A careful examination of the record discloses that the information charges an offense and that there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict.

There being no errors depriving appellant of any substantial rights, the cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 268, 288 P. 1117, 48 Okla. Crim. 23, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pike-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.